🔗 Share this article

Loved ones of people buried in graves at risk from coastal erosion state that a lack of decision on how best to tackle the issue is causing them avoidable anguish about the final resting places of their loved ones.

An Impending Danger to Ancient Graveyards

The council have singled out three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being in danger of being engulfed by the sea in the coming decades.

A recent report on the issue details a range of possible actions, from taking no action to exhuming remains and relocating them in safer locations. Officials say it is for local people to decide how to move forward.

“Right now we’re in limbo. It upsets me. They intended this to be their final resting place, but it isn’t going to be because of the sea.”

Estimates indicate at least part of one graveyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some residents worry it will happen much sooner. “I think it’s got under 20 years, if you look at what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” one said.

Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles

One resident remembered a childhood visit to the nearby settlement of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the water, along with its place of worship and burial ground.

“It was possible to see people’s bones,” she said. “Certain people hold this idealized notion that the deceased will just get carried away to sea. That is not the case. People will collect remains as mementos and go plundering graves in search of treasures. It’s completely undignified.”

“I fear that the identical fate that befell at Eccles will occur here and there’ll be skeletons on the beach. I would feel appalled by that.”

A Soldier's Grave in Peril

Further up the shoreline is situated the grave of a former paratrooper who died while working abroad. His mother expressed she could not sleep after discovering her child's grave might one day be relocated.

“It truly trouble me to think this may not remain his lasting home,” she said. “To our family it’s an significant site to visit.”

In her view, new interments should cease but says it is premature to exhume existing graves. “What I would choose for now is to do nothing and watch carefully, but an timely resolution must be made when a critical moment has been reached.”

Seeking Solutions and Clarity

The lack of consensus over when and how to handle the challenge has resulted in bereaved families feeling frustrated and worried.

Some want more sea defences to slow the inevitable erosion and to permit funerals to proceed for now. Others contend the moment for moving graves is drawing near.

“It is very emotive,” a family member stated. “The official study was really good, but now there’s confusion about how it is taken forward. And everybody is washing their hands over who is accountable.”

A local official confirmed the graveyards were under the care of the local diocese. “Ultimately it is down to them to choose the direction to take. Our role is here to help support them through that process with residents.”

He added there was time to consider all the options. “This concerns decades before it begins getting lost.”

“There is no common view on what should happen yet. It requires good community discussions to discover the right answers for each village.”

The possibility of losing the churches and graveyards was labeled one of “immense sadness for the area,” but faith leaders also spoke of a belief in life after death, providing a theological perspective on the physical loss of sacred ground.